Mitchem v. Rice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing for errors of law whether notice to the defendant was adequate
• discussing required factual showing in analogous context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-17· cited 18×
• Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP v. Menken
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-08· cited 18×
• Carlson v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-05-12· cited 5×
• Gish v. Youngblood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-07-07· cited 5×
• Wright v. Osborne
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-12-03· cited 3×
• Stricklin v. Flavel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-03-27· cited 2×
• Walters v. Angeles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-12-03· cited 1×
• Burton v. Krueger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-02-09

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-12-29· cited 268×
• Jones v. General Motors Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-21· cited 54×
• Kintigh v. Elliott
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-11-01· cited 15×
• Ter Har v. Backus
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-07-23· cited 12×
• Huffman v. Leon De Mendoza
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-07-26· cited 10×
• Mitchem v. Rice
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-17· cited 8×
• In re the Marriage of Dhulst
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-01-19· cited 5×