Mitchell v. Yates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “plaintiffs complaint concede[d] that he [was] capable of performing as a police officer with administrative duties”
• noting that the “plaintiff’s complaint concede[d] that he [was] capable of performing as a police officer with administrative duties”
• noting that “complaint must adequately allege facts sufficient to support the claim that [plaintiff] has a ‘disability’ within the meaning of the ADA, or else be subject to dismissal”
• declining 24 jurisdiction over state-law claims in part because “discovery in th[e] case has been minimal”
• “[P]laintiff’s complaint must adequately allege facts sufficient to support the claim that he has a ‘disability’ within the meaning of the ADA, or else be subject to dismissal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).