Mitchell v. Woodworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• worker’s compensation case; expert opinion based on incomplete facts was not sufficient to support Department of Labor decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miller v. ITT Arctic Services
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-04-21· cited 86×
• U. S. Industries/Federal Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-23· cited 76×
• Sponaugle v. Pre-Term, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-02-13· cited 49×
• William David Hensley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
  D.C. Circuit· 1981-03-17· cited 42×
• Ralph Riley v. U. S. Industries/federal Sheet Metal, Inc. And Insurance Company of North America
  D.C. Circuit· 1980-07-03· cited 9×
• Mitchell v. Woodworth
  D.C. Circuit· 1971-07-06· cited 2×
• Urban Land Institute v. Garrell
  District of Columbia· 1972-06-22· cited 2×
• National Pacific Insurance v. Commissioner, ASG Workmen's Compensation Commission
  High Court of American Samoa· 2004-04-12

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Vincent E. Jenkins v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1962-06-07· cited 218×
• Mary R. Wheatley v. Herman Adler, Deputy Commissioner, United States Department of Labor Bureau of Employees' Compensation
  D.C. Circuit· 1968-05-17· cited 133×

Other cases named Mitchell v. Woodworth

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Mitchell v. Woodworth
  D.C. Circuit· 1971-07-06· cited 2×