Mitchell v. VLI Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Considering that [plaintiff] could have obtained the [product] over-the-counter, it would be illogical to treat her differently based on the mere fortuity that she obtained a sample of the [product] from her physician.”
• declining to apply the LID because the plaintiff ‘could have obtained the sponge over-the- counter,’ and so ‘it would be illogical to treat her differently based on the mere fortuity that she obtained a sample of the sponge from her physician’
• nonprescription contraceptive sponge given to patient by her physician

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).