Mitchell v. Villager Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this argument “presupposes that inmates in SUI-type programs should be considered employees for FLSA purposes in the first place”
• applying the reasoning of Vanskike to inmates who voluntarily enroll in state industries program
• “When a shift ends, inmates do not leave DOC supervision, but rather proceed to the next part of their regimented day.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).