Mitchell v. the Timbers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying “the rule set forth in Harmon” to determine whether an amendment to correct a defendant’s name relates back to the original complaint
• observing that there was no suggestion of “any actual confusion about the nature or identity” of the tavern where the plaintiff sustained his injury—a fac- tor that supported the conclusion that the defendant, who owned that tavern, in fact understood that he was the entity intended to be sued
• the assumed busi- ness name, in context, reasonably identified the registrant as the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).