Mitchell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the court in reviewing a conviction for carnal knowledge, held properly admissible the testimony of three other girls under 12 to the effect that the defendant had attempted to sexually assault them
• wherein the court in reviewing a conviction for carnal knowledge, held properly admissible the testimony of three other girls under 12 to the effect that the defendant had attempted to sexually assault them
• wherein the court, in reviewing a conviction for carnal knowledge, held properly admissible the testimony of three other girls under 12 to the effect that the defendant had attempted to sexually assault them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bowden v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-12-16· cited 109×
• Brewer v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-07-05· cited 97×
• Hogue v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1975-04-01· cited 28×
• Tarkington v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1971-06-21· cited 28×
• King v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-11-10· cited 26×
• Watson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-12-16· cited 14×
• Brumfield v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-06-26· cited 9×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Garner v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1959-09-03· cited 39×
• Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Attorney General
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1951-04-19· cited 33×
• Baggett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1969-12-16· cited 9×
• Brown v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1954-02-09· cited 9×