Mitchell v. State
Citations
- 43 Tex. 512
Syllabus
<p>1. Change of venue.—It is not error to overrule a motion for change of venue where the statute has not been complied with and where no injustice appears to have been done the defendant.</p> <p>2. Practice impaneling jury.—It is not error to allow the district attorney to withdraw his acceptance of a juror for grounds discovered since taking the juror and before the jury is complete, and which disqualify the juror.</p> <p>3. Same.—It is proper in a capital case to require the parties to pass upon each juror as called.</p> <p>4. Calling cases in their order.—This rule does not obtain when a case has been set for a day certain and a special venire ordered for that day.</p> <p>5. Challenge to the array.—It is not a cause of challenge to the array that some jurors of a large venire are incompetent, there being no other evidence of unfairness on the part of the officer summoning the venire.</p>
Judges: Mooke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1956-01-04· cited 17×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-10-07· cited 11×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-04-08· cited 8×
- Gates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1940-06-26· cited 3×
- Buie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1876-07-01
- Houillion v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- O'Neal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1883-10-20
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.