Mitchell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Applying the plain meaning of the language in light of the rule of lenity, ‘under this section’ does not include within its purview out-of-state convictions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ex Parte McKithan
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-10-14· cited 104×
• Kenneth Lee Douds v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-06-05· cited 77×
• St. Clair v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-07-12· cited 70×
• Pena v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1993-11-10· cited 55×
• Sanders v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1998-03-19· cited 45×
• State v. Cullen
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2007-06-27· cited 31×
• Tate v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2003-10-16· cited 21×
• Hocutt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1996-09-12· cited 17×
• Bobby Doyle Getts v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2003-10-29· cited 14×
• Bruns v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2000-03-23· cited 13×
• State v. May
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2007-08-22· cited 13×
• Peña v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-10-06· cited 13×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-10· cited 6×
• Badgett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-07· cited 6×
• Mikeal Wayne Tate v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-10-16
• James White v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-10-18
• Alberto Camacho v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1996-07-17
• Beauhamma Broadnax v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-06-30
• Carlos Flores Hiracheta v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-10-24
• Juan Ramirez v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-05-15