Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2/22/2006
Mitchell v. State
Citations
- 229 S.W.3d 583
- 94 Ark. App. 304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “the action was not commenced because the complaint was not properly served within 120 days”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olly Neal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miles v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-10-03· cited 34×
- Forrest City MacHine Works, Inc. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-11-22· cited 32×
- McCastlain v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-02-10· cited 17×
- Thomson v. ZufariSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-07-01· cited 10×
- In re One 1995 Ford Searcher JamboreeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2002-03-13· cited 5×
- Cloud v. REGIONS INVESTMENTS CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-03-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.