Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 10/17/1997
Mitchell v. State
Citations
- 713 So. 2d 981
- 1997 WL 340669
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where new counsel was appointed to represent the defendant on appeal because the Anders brief was deficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMillan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Ex Parte StorySupreme Court of Alabama· 1983-06-03· cited 60×
- Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-06-28· cited 25×
- Borden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-04-12· cited 22×
- Bright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-12-01· cited 20×
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-11-12· cited 20×
- Walters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-03-29· cited 16×
- W.L.L. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-05-06· cited 13×
- Palmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-09-20· cited 11×
- Rowell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1995-01-13· cited 10×
- Coslett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-12-30· cited 10×
- Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-11-13· cited 10×
- George v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-10-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.