Mitchell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appeal from a new sentence imposed pursuant to a postconviction motion did not divest the trial court of jurisdiction to consider a pending rule 3.850 motion in the same case
• \a trial court lacks jurisdiction to rule on a postconviction motion while the same defendant's direct appeal is pending\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pierce v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-09· cited 9×
• Ross v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-07· cited 4×
• Cross v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-23· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Heggs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-17· cited 853×
• Alvarez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-31· cited 23×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-14· cited 15×
• Francois v. Klein
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-01-27· cited 12×
• Perez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-27· cited 9×
• McGraw v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-26· cited 7×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-17· cited 6×
• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-23· cited 5×
• Keel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-10· cited 5×
• Wilcher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-16· cited 3×
• Campbell-Eley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-05· cited 2×