Mitchell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a rule 8.800(c) motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and that the appellate court has no jurisdiction to review the correctness of the decision
• explaining that a rule 3.800(c) motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and that the appellate court has no jurisdiction to review the correctness of the decision
• explaining that a rule 3.800(c) motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and that the appellate court has no jurisdiction to re view the correctness of the decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Durando v. Palm Beach County
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-29· cited 41×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-22· cited 39×
• Barrington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-25· cited 4×
• Edwards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-28
• Baez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-09
• Parker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-26
• Fotos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-28
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-30
• Washington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-12
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-20

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Durando v. Palm Beach County
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-29· cited 41×
• Daniels v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-03· cited 28×