Mitchell v. Shreveport Creosoting Co.
Citations
- 123 La. 957
- 49 So. 655
- 1909 La. LEXIS 808
Syllabus
<p>1. Appeal and Ebbob (§ 134*) — Pinal Judgment.</p> <p>A minute e try reciting that' the court maintained an exception of “no cause of action” filed by the defendant in a certain case does not show a judgment which authorizes an appeal.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — Por other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. § 898; Dec. Dig. § 134.*]</p> <p>2. Appeal and Ebbob (§ 337*) — Entry of Judgment — Necessity.</p> <p>Where a judgment maintaining an exception of “no cause of action” has been rendered, and the suit dismissed, an appeal is premature until the judgment has been signed, and will be dismissed. Hauch v. E. C. Drew Co., 110 La. 488, 40 South. 847.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — Por other' cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. § 1877; Dec. Dig. 1 337.*]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no relatedness where the defendant law firm’s only contact with Maine was mailing a transfer deed to Maine which was “ancillary” to fraud perpetrated elsewhere
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nicholls
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.