Mitchell v. Quality Plant Service, Inc. (In Re Mitchell)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that if a creditor “is enjoined from continuing a judicial proceeding. . . [a creditor] is obliged to discontinue it”
• stating that if a creditor “is enjoined from continuing a judicial proceeding. . . [a creditor] is obliged to discontinue it”
• “If one is enjoined from continuing a judicial proceeding against the debtor, one is obliged to discontinue it.”
• rejected creditor’s contention that it did not have an affirmative duty to stop garnishment which was effective prior to petition and awarded attorney’s fees to debtor
• “If one is enjoined from continuing a judicial proceeding against the debtor, one is obliged to discontinue it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).