Mitchell v. Preston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, although the pilots’ “Availability Pay” was not hourly compensation under the FLSA, the pilots were not entitled to a “windfall” and therefore it was properly deducted from their regular pay
• “[Plaintiffs are not entitled to a windfall of an additional payment at one and one-half times their regular rate for hours for which they have already been compensated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).