Skip to main content
· 2/19/1974

Mitchell v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

Citations

  • 415 U.S. 920
  • 39 L. Ed. 2d 476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because a motion to realign parties would either destroy or preserve diversity jurisdiction, motions to realign are dispositive
  • Magistrate's decision regarding realignment of parties destroyed federal jurisdiction was dispositive and subject to de novo review by district court.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.