· 2/19/1974
Mitchell v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Citations
- 415 U.S. 920
- 39 L. Ed. 2d 476
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because a motion to realign parties would either destroy or preserve diversity jurisdiction, motions to realign are dispositive
- Magistrate's decision regarding realignment of parties destroyed federal jurisdiction was dispositive and subject to de novo review by district court.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.