Mitchell v. Mormando Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Wal-Mart failed to persuade the court \that Dr. Drogin's regional analysis should be rejected ... because it is lacking in probative value\
• concluding that \[Wal-Mart] has not discredited or nullified Dr. Drogin's results\ with respect to Wal-Mart's objection that Drogin's methodology failed to account for a variety of relevant factors
• coneluding that Wal-Mart failed to persuade the court “that Dr. Drogin’s regional analysis should be rejected ... because it is lacking in probative value”
• certifying a class of “[a]ll women employed at any Wal-Mart domestic retail store at any time since December 26, 1998[,] who have been or may be subjected to Wal-Mart’s challenged pay and management track promotions policies and practices”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).