Mitchell v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a party waived a right to an evidentiary hearing by failing to assert the right
• noting that the trial court is not obligated to hold an evidentiary hearing to resolve a factual dispute or ambiguity in a divorce proceeding unless requested by a party
• “ [W]e hold that a trial court is obligated to conduct an evidentiary hearing to resolve an ambiguity or a factual dispute that arises in a proceeding related to a divorce only if a party specifically asks for an evidentiary hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vittiglio v. Vittiglio
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2012-07-31· cited 72×
• Moore v. Moore
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-12-08· cited 64×
• Kurt J Hein v. Terri Jo Hein
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2021-04-29

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sparks v. Sparks
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1992-06-30· cited 264×
• Beason v. Beason
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-11· cited 174×
• Greene v. Greene
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1959-10-12· cited 32×
• Thompson v. Merritt
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-12-30· cited 30×
• Varga v. Varga
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-12-05· cited 19×
• Walker v. Walker
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1950-05-18· cited 16×
• Vigil v. Vigil
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-07-19· cited 11×