Skip to main content
· 1/5/2010

Mitchell v. Luckenbill

Citations

  • 680 F. Supp. 2d 672
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 296
  • 2010 WL 56099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the actions taken by the defendant state troopers, which occurred when they “were on duty, in uniform, and investigating a crime throughout the duration of the alleged offenses” were within the scope of their employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas I. Vanaskie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.