Skip to main content
· 7/20/2001

Mitchell v. Heinrichs

Citations

  • 27 P.3d 309
  • 2001 Alas. LEXIS 88
  • 2001 WL 818287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a dog’s sentimental value cannot be recovered
  • upholding the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant on an IIED claim after the evidence only showed that he had “acted in a manner justified under the community standards embodied in the municipal ordinance”
  • under value to owner theory pet owner may seek reasonable replacement costs — such as costs of purchasing a puppy of the same breed, immunization, neutering, and comparable training

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.