Mitchell v. Gilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the lower court’s holding that concurrent tortfeasors were jointly and severally liable when they produced a single indivisible injury and the resulting damages lacked a rational basis for apportionment
• tortfeasors jointly liable for individual acts of negligence against the plaintiff combining to create a single injury
• \We conclude that the opinion of the Court of Appeals correctly states the law of Georgia on this subject and we adopt [its] opinion.\
• when two doctors independently treat a patient, they may he held jointly and severally liable if their independent negligent acts produce an indivisible injury
• “We conclude that the opinion of the Court of Appeals correctly states the law of Georgia on this subject and we adopt [its] opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).