Mitchell v. Fitzharris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• party offering material attached to a pleading as a “true and correct” copy is bound by the material
• “[W]e cannot conclude, without clear statutory support, that Congress intended the EHA to abrogate such a provision in a privately negotiated contract. We are confident that Congress would not have done so without explicitly so providing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).