· 1/19/1981
Mitchell v. First Nat. Bank of Dozier
Citations
- 505 F. Supp. 176
- 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17976
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a bank which did no more than furnish information to a consumer reporting agency was not itself a consumer reporting agency but did qualify under the FCRA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hobbs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.