Mitchell v. Estelle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Rule 615 of the Federal Rules of Evidence to Rule 30(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure — the federal analogues to Wis. Stat. §§ 906.15 and 804.05(4) respectively
• “While a district judge may exercise wide discretion in allowing more than one corporate representative to be present, the court finds that the instant case is not one that would warrant the attendance of both Mr. Carithers and Mr. Barnes at Plaintiff’s deposition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).