Mitchell v. Dixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• petitioners lacked standing to complain of city’s failure to compose statutorily mandated examination board
• petitioners lacked standing to complain of city's failure to compose statutorily mandated examination board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hunt v. Bass
  Texas Supreme Court· 1984-02-01· cited 298×
• Terrazas v. Ramirez
  Texas Supreme Court· 1991-12-17· cited 174×
• United Oil & Minerals, Inc. v. Costilla Energy, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1999-08-31· cited 41×
• A & W INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Day
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-07-16· cited 40×
• United States v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corporation, a Corporation
  Third Circuit· 1972-05-30· cited 25×
• DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Inman
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-11-20· cited 24×
• State v. Teninty
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1949-10-05· cited 12×
• City of El Paso v. Alvarez
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1996-10-16· cited 6×
• State v. Alix
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1972-07-12· cited 3×
• Hunt v. Bass
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-05-19· cited 3×
• Drew Canty, Ashley Canty, Raymond Davis and Carolyn Davis v. City of Nacogdoches
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2009-10-14