Mitchell v. Deal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[w]hen asked to further expand the scope of the tort action beyond workers’ compensation and ‘whistle-blower’ related discharges, *** our supreme court has drawn the line and denied plaintiffs’ retaliatory discharge causes of action”
• rejecting a claim for retaliatory discharge by a farm laborer not covered by the Workers’ Compensation Act
• rejecting a claim for retaliatory discharge by a farm laborer not covered by the Workers' Compensation Act
• rejecting a claim for retaliatory discharge by a farm laborer not covered by the Workers’ Compensation Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).