Skip to main content
· 7/22/2003

Mitchell v. DCX, Inc.

Citations

  • 274 F. Supp. 2d 33
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12492
  • 2003 WL 21694565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the traditional tort theory of respondeat superior to a §1981 public accommodation claim involving a taxicab driver
  • applying the traditional tort theory of respondeat superior to a § 1981 public accommodation claim involving a taxicab driver
  • discussing unintentional disparate-impact discrimination claims under the DCHRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.