Mitchell v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that right to prospectively challenge a placement recognized in M.O. implies procedural right to timely information about the DOE’s proposed placement “so as to enable them to assess and comment on that placement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).