Mitchell v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing prior inconsistent statement exception and the recent complaint exception in Virginia Code § 19.2-268.2
• “The details of the victim’s complaint were elements of the offense. Without those details, the complaint would have been incomplete.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-07-12· cited 108×
• Breeden v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-06-01· cited 70×
• McLean v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-04-18· cited 48×
• Jasper v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-05-22· cited 32×
• Keith Alexander Mayberry v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2016-03-08· cited 14×
• Gurganus v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-04-20· cited 2×
• Charles Allen Breeden v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-06-01
• Derek Wayne Gurganus v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-10-05
• Commonwealth v. Wills
  Spotsylvania County Circuit Court· 1998-02-20
• Dilliraj Bista v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2023-09-12

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blain v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-09-06· cited 375×
• Faison v. Hudson
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1992-04-17· cited 41×
• Woodard v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-09-13· cited 40×
• Morrissey v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-03-30· cited 4×