Mitchell v. Castellaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ordinance banning the sale of grade A raw milk was not inconsistent with a state statute for grading and labeling milk because the two provisions served different purposes
• holding the question of necessity “is one of mixed law and fact and accordingly one for the fact finder in the ordinary case.”
• holding “[t]he question of strict necessity [or not] is one of mixed law and fact and accordingly one for the fact finder in the ordinary case.”
• holding the question of necessity “is one of mixed law and fact and accordingly one for the fact finder in the ordinary case.”
• applying strict necessity rule from \way of necessity\ precedent to claim involving reserved easement by prior use
• applying strict necessity rule from “way of necessity” precedent to claim involving reserved easement by prior use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).