Mitchell v. Beaver Dredging Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction to rescind settlement agreement “in the absence of a claim for money damages for breach of contract”
• noting that the “contract itself does not need to be money-mandating because money damages are the default remedy for a breach of contract.”
• noting that the court “cannot award an equitable remedy in the absence of a viable claim for money damages” and that a request “that the court reinstate [a] Title VII discrimination claim[ ]” is “relief .., beyond the court’s jurisdiction”
• reviewing the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California to transfer a case to the Court of Federal Claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).