Mitchell v. Badler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where plaintiff had not held actual title but had expended money, labor, and time in construction of house, imposition constructive trust was proper
• imposition of constructive trust was proper even where plaintiff “never had actual title” because, nevertheless, “plaintiffs interest in the property [was] overwhelmingly established by virtue of [her] expenditure[ ]” of money, labor, and time in the construction of the house

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).