Mitchell v. Badgett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 1500 did not apply because the parties stipulated that the complaint in this court was filed earlier in the day than the district court case
• explaining that \the statutory language of section 1500 does not allow a court to disregard the respective timing of the complaints\
• listing three 2011 United States Court of Federal Claims opinions holding that the “order-of-filing” rule remains good law after Tohono
• “[The] measuring point, in the ease of section 1500, is when the complaint is filed.”
• “Despite defendant’s claims, it is abundantly clear that Tohono did not expressly overrule Tecon.”
• “[I]t is abundantly clear Tohono did not expressly overturn Tecon.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).