Skip to main content
· 3/31/2006

Mitchell v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Co.

Citations

  • 428 F. Supp. 2d 725
  • 2006 WL 942090

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • retail store managers, who performed nearly identical functions to those performed by Plaintiffs were properly classified as exempt
  • “Courts have uniformly held that Ohio’s wage and hour law should be interpreted in accordance with the FLSA.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sargus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.