MITCHELL, JOSHUA, PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that smart meters were not in general public use because they “have been adopted only by a portion of a highly specialized industry”
• privacy interests are “lessened” where there is “no prosecutorial intent” (citing Camara v. Mun. Ct. of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523, 530 (1967)
• privacy interests are “lessened” where there SANCHEZ V. LADOT 7 is “no prosecutorial intent” (citing Camara v. Mun. Ct. of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523, 530 (1967)
• “[T]he Illinois Supreme Court will interpret a provision of the Illinois Constitution in the same way as a similar provision in the Federal Constitution absent certain exceptional circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).