Mitchell G. King, Jr. v. Milton Greenblatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting by implication an argument that a smaller attorney’s fees award was proper because the case was not “of truly exceptional public importance”
• “Of those factors [factors governing fee applications], the result achieved has the greatest determinative weight.” Id. at 887.
• permitting consideration of \the amount involved and the results obtained\
• permitting consideration of “the amount involved and the results obtained”
• Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act
• requiring “full and specific accounting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).