Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 3/1/2016

Mitchell Alicea v. Aubrey Thomas

Citations

  • 815 F.3d 283
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3792
  • 2016 WL 805529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[c]ommanding a dog to attack a suspect who is already complying with orders” “violates clearly established law,” despite the absence of closely analogous precedent
  • finding that an officer could have used excessive force by beating a plaintiff who didn’t present a threat or resist arrest in any way
  • noting that “[c]ommanding a dog to attack a suspect who is already complying with orders” violates clearly established law
  • finding that an officer could have acted unreasonably when he “command[ed] a dog to attack a suspect who had ceased flight, was effectively trapped, and who immediately complied with police orders.”
  • punching, kicking, and stomping a suspect who is face-down on the ground are unjustified uses of force if suspect is compliant
  • finding it improper to determine qualified immunity when there was a material dispute as to whether plaintiff was resisting arrest when force was used upon him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Hamilton, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.