Skip to main content
· 8/16/2000

Mitchell Alfred Patterson v. James H. Gomez, Director

Citations

  • 223 F.3d 959
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9097
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6848
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 20175
  • 2000 WL 1154254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “if a jury is instructed that a defendant must be presumed ‘sane’ . . . a reasonable juror could well conclude that he or she must presume that the defendant had no . . . mental disease, defect, or disorder”
  • “A jury instruction cannot relieve the state of the burden of proving beyond a rea- sonable doubt a crucial element of the criminal offense.”
  • “A constitutional error is harmless on federal habeas review of a state court conviction unless it ‘had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sneed, Pregerson, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.