Mitan v. Feeney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that discovery is warranted only if the plaintiff “make[s] a 27 ‘colorable’ showing,” which is “less than a prima facie showing,” of “‘some evidence’ 28 tending to establish personal jurisdiction over the defendant”
• stating that discovery is warranted 26 only if the plaintiff “make[s] a ‘colorable’ showing,” which is “less than a prima facie 27 showing,” of “‘some evidence’ tending to establish personal jurisdiction over the 28 defendant.”
• noting the “small degree of 21 interjection” when the defendant’s “only contact . . . with California relating to Plaintiff was 22 initiated by the Redondo Beach police after Plaintiff had been arrested”
• “In order to obtain discovery on jurisdictional facts, the plaintiff must at least 14 make a ‘colorable’ showing that the Court can exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant.”
• “In order to obtain discovery on jurisdictional facts, the plaintiff must at least 14 make a ‘colorable’ showing that the Court can exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant.”
• Employee Retirement Income Security Act violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).