Misztal v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, where the resentencing was proportionally greater, that there could be no chilling effect because the sentence was nonetheless reduced to a fewer number of years on resentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Riffe v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-12-23· cited 15×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Flowers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-02-10· cited 18×
• Coble v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-05-06· cited 18×
• Misztal v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-09-17· cited 7×
• Barnett v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-09-23· cited 2×