· 3/17/2006
Mistick PBT v. Chao, Elaine
Citations
- 440 F.3d 503
- 370 U.S. App. D.C. 181
- 11 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 481
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6599
- 2006 WL 664200
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where an agency departs from established precedent without a reasoned explanation, its decision will be vacated as arbitrary and capricious.”
- “An agency’s ‘failure to respond meaningfully to the evidence renders its decisions arbitrary and capricious.’” (quoting Alaska Petro. Co. v. FERC, 234 F.3d 1286, 1294 (D.C. Cir. 2000)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Griffith, Henderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.