Skip to main content
· 3/17/2006

Mistick PBT v. Chao, Elaine

Citations

  • 440 F.3d 503
  • 370 U.S. App. D.C. 181
  • 11 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 481
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 6599
  • 2006 WL 664200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where an agency departs from established precedent without a reasoned explanation, its decision will be vacated as arbitrary and capricious.”
  • “An agency’s ‘failure to respond meaningfully to the evidence renders its decisions arbitrary and capricious.’” (quoting Alaska Petro. Co. v. FERC, 234 F.3d 1286, 1294 (D.C. Cir. 2000)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Griffith, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.