Mister v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant waived claim that sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment by not raising the issue below
• holding that a co-defendant’s prior statements made at his guilty plea hearing were not admissible to corroborate his trial testimony because the witness’s “guilty plea hearing did not predate any improper motive he may have had to testify against [the defendant]”
• accomplice’s statement that he and defendant were “running around robbing people”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).