Mister B Textiles Inc. v. Woodcrest Fabrics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Defendant contests both plaintiff’s ownership of its patent, and the patent’s validity.”
• A “long judicial tradition” supports a “general judicial 27 policy of deference to the executive in the area of foreign relations[.]” (citing Dames 28 & Moore v. Regan, 453 U.S. 654 (1981); Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280 (1981)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).