Skip to main content
· 2/22/1983

Missouri v. McKinney

Citations

  • 459 U.S. 1193
  • 103 S. Ct. 1172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the denial of the Rule 59(e) motion was not an abuse of discretion when plaintiffs counsel knew all relevant facts prior to the entry of judgment but just failed to assert them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.