Missouri v. Illinois
Citations
- 202 U.S. 598
- 26 S. Ct. 713
- 50 L. Ed. 1160
- 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1556
Syllabus
<p>This court has power to allow costs in original actions and in any action between States, the successful State may ask for costs or not as it sees fit, and there is no absolute rule that in boundary cases the costs are divided. Costs, therefore, are allowed to the defendant in this suit in which'the plaintiff alleged serious pecuniary damage, and framed its bill like the ordinary bill of a private person to restrain a nuisance.</p> <p>The solicitor’s fee of $2.50 for each witness examined before the examiner and admitted in evidence was properly allowed as fees for depositions under § 824, Rev. Stat.</p>
Judges: Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Guardian Trust Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1928-05-18· cited 62×
- Virginia v. West VirginiaSupreme Court· 1918-04-22· cited 44×
- Equitable Life Assurance Society v. BaginSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1965-07-06· cited 5×
- The MaryW.D. Washington· 1916-03-06· cited 4×
- Reynolds v. WadeD. Alaska· 1956-04-23· cited 1×
- State of West Virginia v. Michael T. McGeeWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2016-09-19
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court· 1892-02-29· cited 196×
- Missouri v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1906-02-19· cited 108×
- Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.Supreme Court· 1856-05-12· cited 23×
- Stimpson v. BrooksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1856-04-15· cited 16×
- Missouri v. IowaSupreme Court· 1896-02-03· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.