· 4/7/2015
Missouri Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Citations
- 414 U.S. App. D.C. 357
- 783 F.3d 310
- 183 Oil & Gas Rep. 229
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5530
- 2015 WL 1529259
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “deference is due to the Commission’s interpretation of its own precedent”
- describing the Commission’s “two-part benefits exception test”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garland, Rogers, Millett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.