Skip to main content
· 4/29/1912

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Lessenden

Citations

  • 225 U.S. 696
  • 32 S. Ct. 838
  • 56 L. Ed. 1262
  • 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because of public education’s constitutionally preferred status in this State, expenditures for public education cannot be reduced under W.Va.Code, 5A-2-23, in the absence of a compelling factual record to demonstrate the necessity therefor”
  • “Because of public education’s constitutionally preferred status in the State, expenditures for public education cannot be reduced . . . in the absence of a compelling factual record to demonstrate the necessity therefor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.