Skip to main content
· 5/5/1900

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Goodholm

Citations

  • 61 Kan. 758
  • 60 P. 1066
  • 1900 Kan. LEXIS 124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is not the duty of an [assessing] officer to omit a statutory duty because of an opinion that the action of his superiors has not conformed to law. He has merely to do his duty as prescribed by law, leaving the regularity of the action of others to be determined by the courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.