Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting a statute’s plain command that an agency “shall consider” certain factors
• ICC, in considering anticompetitive effects of proposed railroad merger, not required to make specific findings about tendency of merger to encourage other future mergers; \an agency is not required to make specific findings in the course of making future projections\
• ICC, in considering anticompetitive effects of proposed railroad merger, not required to make specific findings about tendency of merger to encourage other future mergers; “an agency is not required to make specific findings in the course of making future projections”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).